I can remember arguing with the presiding overseer out in service over 1975 (this was before obviously and he thought it was coming Oct. 1, 1975) and I mean we were really arguing. Today I would have been called disrespectful and my father taken into a back room and chastised. The sister who studied with me (early 70's) made it a point of reading other religon's books, magazines, etc. just to "keep up". It was well known in that congregation and it was considered a good thing. There didn't seem to be the fear of exposing the mind to alternative teachings. The attitude used to be that this was "The Truth" and it can stand up to anything. Not anymore. Now it seems as if people need to hear a talk, or read an article, before they know what they are allowed to think or which way their opinion should lean.
I was pioneering when the Ray Franz scandal broke and I remember being shocked that so many people had a problem with studying the Bible. I mean, isn't that supposed to be the point of why we were there? I remember making that comment to my pioneer partner, and he responded with the usual "We need the Society's direction; yada yada". I remember telling him that when I started studying, the sister used only the Bible. No literature was used. Ever. No Truth book, no Great Teacher book, just the Bible. I'll always remember what he said, "Well she couldn't do that now without getting in trouble with the elders." I haven't been to meetings since 1989, so I can only imagine the lack of free thought floating around now.